Skip to main content

User account menu

  • Log in
DBS-Logo

Database Group Leipzig

within the department of computer science

ScaDS-Logo Logo of the University of Leipzig

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Study
    • Exams
      • Hinweise zu Klausuren
    • Courses
      • Current
    • Modules
    • LOTS-Training
    • Abschlussarbeiten
    • Masterstudiengang Data Science
    • Oberseminare
    • Problemseminare
    • Top-Studierende
  • Research
    • Projects
      • Benchmark datasets for entity resolution
      • FAMER
      • HyGraph
      • Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage
      • GRADOOP
    • Publications
    • Prototypes
    • Annual reports
    • Cooperations
    • Graduations
    • Colloquia
    • Conferences
  • Team
    • Erhard Rahm
    • Member
    • Former employees
    • Associated members
    • Gallery

Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations

Do, H. ; Melnik, S. ; Rahm, E.

Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations

Proc. Workshop Web and Databases, LNCS 2593, 2003

2003

Paper

Abstract

Recently, schema matching has found considerable interest in both research and practice. Determining matching components of database or XML schemas is needed in many applications, e.g. for E-business and data integration. Various schema matching systems have been developed to solve the problem semi-automatically. While there have been some evaluations, the overall effectiveness of currently available automatic schema matching systems is largely unclear. This is because the evaluations were conducted in diverse ways making it difficult to assess the effectiveness of each single system, let alone to compare their effectiveness. In this paper we survey recently published schema matching evaluations. For this purpose, we introduce the major criteria that influence the effectiveness of a schema matching approach and use these criteria to compare the various systems. Based on our observations, we discuss the requirements for future match implementations and evaluations.

Recent publications

  • 2025 / 9: Generating Semantically Enriched Mobility Data from Travel Diaries
  • 2025 / 8: Slice it up: Unmasking User Identities in Smartwatch Health Data
  • 2025 / 6: SecUREmatch: Integrating Clerical Review in Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage
  • 2025 / 6: Leveraging foundation models and goal-dependent annotations for automated cell confluence assessment
  • 2025 / 5: Federated Learning With Individualized Privacy Through Client Sampling

Footer menu

  • Directions
  • Contact
  • Impressum