Skip to main content

User account menu

  • Log in
DBS-Logo

Database Group Leipzig

within the department of computer science

ScaDS-Logo Logo of the University of Leipzig

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Study
    • Exams
      • Hinweise zu Klausuren
    • Courses
      • Current
    • Modules
    • LOTS-Training
    • Abschlussarbeiten
    • Masterstudiengang Data Science
    • Oberseminare
    • Problemseminare
    • Top-Studierende
  • Research
    • Projects
      • Benchmark datasets for entity resolution
      • FAMER
      • HyGraph
      • Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage
      • GRADOOP
    • Publications
    • Prototypes
    • Annual reports
    • Cooperations
    • Graduations
    • Colloquia
    • Conferences
  • Team
    • Erhard Rahm
    • Member
    • Former employees
    • Associated members
    • Gallery

Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations.

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations.

Do, H. ; Melnik, S. ; Rahm, E.

Comparison of Schema Matching Evaluations.

Proc. GI-Workshop \"Web and Databases\", Erfurt, Oct. 2002

2002

Paper

Futher information: http://lips.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/pub/2002-28

Abstract

Recently, schema matching has found considerable interest in both
research and practice. Determining matching components of database or XML schemas is needed in many applications, e.g. for E-business and data integration. Various schema matching systems have been developed to solve the problem semi-automatically. While there have been some evaluations, the overall effectiveness of currently available automatic schema matching systems is largely unclear. This is because the evaluations were conducted in diverse ways making it difficult to assess the effectiveness of each single system, let alone to compare their effectiveness. In this paper we survey recently published schema matching evaluations. For this purpose, we introduce the major criteria that influence the
effectiveness of a schema matching approach and use these criteria to compare the various systems. Based on our observations, we discuss the requirements for future match implementations and evaluations.

Recent publications

  • 2025 / 9: Generating Semantically Enriched Mobility Data from Travel Diaries
  • 2025 / 8: Slice it up: Unmasking User Identities in Smartwatch Health Data
  • 2025 / 7: MPGT: Multimodal Physics-Constrained Graph Transformer Learning for Hybrid Digital Twins
  • 2025 / 6: Leveraging foundation models and goal-dependent annotations for automated cell confluence assessment
  • 2025 / 6: SecUREmatch: Integrating Clerical Review in Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage

Footer menu

  • Directions
  • Contact
  • Impressum